Is Africa the only cradle of humanity? The cradle of humanity was not in Africa East Africa is the cradle of humanity

Over the 150 years of studying the history of human origins and development, which began with the discovery of Neanderthal man, many theories have been put forward, accepted, challenged and rejected. The very time of the appearance of the first ancestors of people with each new discovery moved further into the depths of centuries. But with each new discovery, the number of questions does not become smaller, but, on the contrary, only increases. Where is the one ancestor from whom all hominids, including humans, descended? Is Africa really the only cradle of humanity? And if this is so, then how many times and when did ancient man leave this continent? When did ancient people master fire? And perhaps one of the most important questions is when did a person speak? After all, mastery of speech is the most important feature that distinguishes a person from an animal.

Research over the past two decades has forced us to look at the world in new ways. Homo erectus- Homo erectus. It was he, driven by a thirst for finding new habitats, who left Africa and moved towards the unknown. In a fairly short time, it spread from the Iberian Peninsula to Indonesia.

But what path did he take? Homo erectus is traditionally considered an exclusively land creature. However, the latest discoveries in Spain prompted the famous anthropologist Philip Tobayes to put forward a theory about the possible seafaring abilities of these proto-humans and their crossing of the Strait of Gibraltar. Latest discovery on the Indonesian island of Flores may support this theory. But supporters of the traditional version do not give up, and in scientific world A discussion arose about the validity of this theory.

Today in the scientific world there has been a wide discussion about the possible penetration primitive man to Europe through the Strait of Gibraltar (In May of this year, the conference “Plio-Pleistocene climate changes, change of faunas and human spread” was held in Terragon). An alternative hypothesis suggests that this penetration took place through the Middle East. So, could ancient man cross Gibraltar? Let's turn to paleontology for the answer.

Africa is a continent that has already yielded so many interesting anthropological finds and still hides many secrets of the origin and evolution of man. For a long time, the ancestors of people roamed the vast expanses African savannas, gradually improving their skills in obtaining food and in methods of protection from the weather and predators. But then something subtly began to change in the world around them, something changed in themselves, and they were uncontrollably drawn into the distance. Perhaps their homeland became too small for them, perhaps already in those of our distant ancestors the spirit of adventurers awoke, precisely the spirit that for centuries called people on the road. And they responded to this eternal call, and set off on a thousand-year journey.

Or maybe everything was much more prosaic? In those distant times, when a person’s survival directly depended on who and how much he caught in a hunt, tribes of ancient hunters were forced to move after herds of large animals - a kind of mobile food bases. In this case, considering the likely routes of settlement ancient man from Africa, one must take into account not only specific archaeological or anthropological finds, but also evidence of the distribution of animals, especially large mammals, 1.5 - 2.5 million years ago. But whatever the motives that forced our distant ancestors to set out on the journey, it remains open question: how did they penetrate into Europe? Proponents of the migration hypothesis through the Strait of Gibraltar put forward the following arguments:

There is a high probability that there was a land bridge that connected Europe and Africa in the area of ​​​​the Strait of Gibraltar (or at least the distance between them was much shorter);

There could have been some kind of “transshipment point” - an island in the middle of the strait through which the
migration;

Europe was visible from Africa.

If we discard the romantic component of the motivation for the “great migration of peoples” - the spirit of adventure, then first of all we should pay attention to the natural situation that developed towards the end of the Pliocene (2.5 - 2 million years ago) and was determined by two very significant factors- tectonic activity and global climate changes. By this time, the formation of the main modern features of the relief of northern Africa, Europe and Western Asia had been completed. In addition, the large wave of mammal migration from Africa at the end of the Pliocene - beginning of the Pleistocene (2 - 1.5 million years ago) was directly related to significant climate change- the beginning of another cold snap, which led in the Pleistocene to the formation of vast ice sheets in Eurasia. But cooling, which leads to glaciation and a sharp deterioration in living conditions in high latitudes, in low latitudes, on the contrary, causes a noticeable softening of the climate, and, first of all, an increase atmospheric precipitation, which accordingly has the most favorable effect on natural conditions. Thus, in place of the modern, practically lifeless sands of the Sahara, during the Pleistocene glaciations, there was a savannah, where life was seething, and hippopotamuses basked in the sun in numerous lakes. In addition, during cold spells, giant herds of large mammals roamed across the expanses of Europe and Asia, not occupied by ice sheets - an inexhaustible source of food for ancient people. All this significantly expanded the limits of their distribution.

The formation of glaciers contributed to the accumulation of huge masses of water - the ocean areas were reduced, but after the ice melted, the water returned to them again. This caused general, so-called eustatic, fluctuations in sea level. During the glacial period, it dropped - according to various estimates, by 85 - 120 meters in relation to the modern one, exposing land bridges along which people were able, for example, to penetrate the islands of Southeast Asia.

This seemed to be the explanation of how a bridge could have formed at the site of the Strait of Gibraltar. But, unfortunately, it must be noted that the largest glaciers in terms of volume were formed not 1 - 1.5 million years ago, but much later - about 300 thousand years ago, in the Middle Pleistocene. During maximum glaciation, tongues of ice sheets crawled on the East European Plain to 48° N, and in North America- right up to 37° N. That is, during the period of interest to us, if there was a shallowing of the Strait of Gibraltar, it was not as noticeable as we would like. While the width of Gibraltar is not too large, 14 - 44 kilometers, there are very significant depths here (the greatest depth is 1181 meters) with a very narrow shelf zone, that is, we have a narrow and deep trench between two continents.

What happened in living nature? About two million years ago in the area North Africa and Western Asia, animals very willingly set out on the road in search of more attractive habitats or, taking advantage of the favorable environment, expanded their possessions. As usual, the herbivores walked ahead, gradually moving across the vast pastures. After them, after their lawful prey, predators set off, and man did not lag behind them.

At that time there were two flows - from Africa to Asia and back. The place where these flows crossed and mixed was the Arabian Peninsula. Here, in the late Pliocene, lived a very peculiar mammal fauna, in which animals, both natives of Africa and Asia, were intricately mixed. African migrants, taking advantage of the favorable conditions, moved further north and east and, in particular, reached the Caucasus. This is evidenced by the findings at the Dmanisi site of the remains of such African animals as giraffe and ostrich.

Considering this movement of animals, we can confidently consider the Dmanisi man as a native of Africa.

At the same time, in European sites of ancient faunas there are very few African elements, as well as European ones in African ones, which indicates a very insignificant direct exchange between Africa and Europe.

IN last years A group of British scientists conducted a study of the possible migration routes of animals from Africa, analyzing data on fossil finds, modern distribution, as well as the study of mitochondrial DNA. Main conclusion, which these researchers came to: over the past 2 million years, the main routes of distribution of the vast majority of animals from Africa to Europe were carried out in a roundabout way - around the Mediterranean through Western Asia and the Balkans.

One of the most bright examples This, in addition to numerous paleontological finds, is supported by the study of mitochondrial DNA of modern bats. These animals from North Africa are much closer to their relatives from the Canary Islands, Turkey and the Balkans than to the inhabitants of the Iberian Peninsula. There is a small group of animals that have undoubtedly swam across, perhaps more than once, Gibraltar - some amphibians and reptiles. Being excellent swimmers, they are most likely the exception that proves the rule.

As the Spanish paleontologist Jan van der Made notes in his work, settlement through the sea strait 1 - 1.5 million years ago is very difficult to prove, even if the distance between the shores of the strait was small, the other shore was visible and there was an island in the strait, the existence of which made it is possible to cross the channel in two “steps”. Both geological and geographical evidence for this theory only indicate that migration across the strait was possible, but in no way prove that it actually took place.

Indeed, there are many examples in nature where it is possible to prove the spread of animals by crossing the sea. For example, migration to islands. Such small animals as mice, which no one would suspect of the ability to overcome huge, and not only in comparison with their own size, sea spaces, reached the Canary Islands, covering a distance of 7 - 90 kilometers. Of course, they were unlikely to overcome this by swimming, but they could well have used natural rafts, such as tree trunks.

Ancient elephants swam to Cyprus, overcoming a sea space of more than 60 kilometers, and this is confirmed by finds of fossil remains. Deer were also good colonizers, and their fossil remains have been found in Crete, although it is very difficult to determine exactly the distance they had to travel to reach Crete due to significant tectonic activity in this region (according to some estimates, the magnitude of horizontal displacements was on the order of 30 - 60 kilometers).

Other animals were not such capable travelers and could not cross such large expanses of water, but large cats, for example, covered distances of up to 20 kilometers.

Thus, we have good examples of the possibility of different animals crossing sea spaces. And here a completely reasonable question arises: why didn’t this happen in the Gibraltar area? Why did it pose a serious obstacle throughout the Pleistocene?

Perhaps, as the Spanish researcher believes, this was due to a very strong surface current in the strait, which made crossing extremely difficult.

In fact, all the arguments put forward against the entry of animals into Europe through Gibraltar are also valid to refute the theory of human settlement by the same route. For most Mediterranean islands, the earliest evidence of ancient humans dates back to the late Pleistocene and Holocene and for the most part(if not always) associated with species Homo sapiens.

Of course, as evidence of the ability of ancient people to overcome large open sea spaces, we can consider the finds on the island of Flores (Indonesia). But no matter how early man reached this very remote island, the species later developed in complete isolation and eventually became extinct. If upon reaching the island the ancient people used some kind of watercraft, then why did they subsequently lose the ability to create and use them? If the body of water was crossed by swimming, then it must be taken into account that covering a fairly large distance in tropical waters is still much easier than crossing Gibraltar, albeit not so wide, in glacial period. Of course, it is quite likely that individual human individuals could easily cross the strait: voluntarily, in an effort to find new hunting grounds, or involuntarily, carried away by storm waves. But they could not create a viable population.

Surely the people standing on the African coast were attracted by its unknownness of the land, separated from them by only a few kilometers of water - it seems that just a little, and you can reach that shore. But to get to the Iberian Peninsula, they had to, like Alice through the Looking Glass, move in the opposite direction - through the Middle East, the Balkans - around the Mediterranean Sea.

It seems quite logical from the point of view of the development of history that the World Heritage Site - the Cradle of Humankind, included in the UNESCO list in 1999, is located in a place where some kind of invisible connection with the past still remains. You can see such an outlandish phenomenon by driving about 50 kilometers away.

What is the Cradle of Humankind monument?

The Cradle of Humankind Monument is not just a free-standing monument, as a tourist might think when he first heard this name. It's about about a complex consisting of limestone caves occupying an area of ​​no less than 474 square kilometers. There are a total of 30 caves and each of them is unique in its own way, because it was the site of discoveries of fossil remains of great historical value.

The excavations helped archaeologists find about five hundred remains of ancient humans, many animal remains and even tools made by African tribes.

11 years ago, a Visitor Reception Center was opened in the complex, but even now, researchers continue to look in this area for something that can reveal the secrets of distant history. Tourists who come here on a tour have a unique opportunity to look at incredible finds and feel the special atmosphere of history created by ancient people, see ancient human sites and incredibly beautiful stalactites and stalagmites. The Visitor Reception Center also broadcasts the evolutionary stages of humanity on special displays. In addition, various exhibitions are also organized here and are available for visiting. Very close to the complex is good hotel where you can stay for the night.

By the way, tourists do not always have time to explore all the caves, and therefore, when going to the Cradle of Humankind and having time restrictions, it is recommended to opt for viewing the most interesting of them:

• Sterkfontein Caves;
• Cave of Miracles;
• Malapa Cave;
• Swartkrans cave;
• Rising Star Cave.

The most interesting caves in the Cradle of Humankind

So, once you find yourself in the Cradle of Humankind, you should go to a group of caves. known to those that in 1947, the remains of an Australopithecus were first discovered here by Robert Broome and John Robinson. The caves are approximately 20-30 million years old and cover an area of ​​500 square meters.

The Cave of Miracles is also among the monuments world heritage and is of great interest to tourists. Its size is the third in the entire country, and its age is about one and a half million years. Tourists in the cave are traditionally impressed by the stalactite and stalagmite formations, of which there are a total of 14, reaching a height of 15 meters. An interesting fact is that, according to researchers, 85% of caves continue to grow in size even today.

Another interesting cave is called Malapa Cave. 8 years ago, in the cave, archaeologists found the remains of skeletons, whose age is 1.9 million years old, and the remains of baboons were also found here, so tourists will definitely have something to see here.

Fragments of ancient people are presented in the Swartkrans Cave and the Rising Star Cave. By the way, in the last of them excavations were carried out not so long ago and covered the period from 2013 to 2014, so tourists can expect completely “fresh” finds of antiquity.

This article or section needs revision. Please improve the article in accordance with the rules for writing articles... Wikipedia

Sterkfontein Caves- Archaeologists in a building above the entrance to Sterkfontein. Sterkfontein Caves are famous for six underground chambers at a depth of more than 40 meters. Located near Johannesburg. In one... Wikipedia

Paleoanthropology- (Greek παλαιανθρωπολογία, from παλαιός ancient and ἄνθρωπος man) a branch of physical anthropology that studies the evolution of hominids based on fossil remains ... Wikipedia

African origins hypothesis- The hypothesis of the African origin of man is a hypothesis according to which the area of ​​human origin is located in Africa. The founders of this hypothesis are famous archaeologists the Leakey family. The hypothesis is based on findings in... ... Wikipedia

N. F. Fedorov

Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov- Portrait of Nikolai Fedorov by Leonid Pasternak Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov (June 7, 1829 December 28, 1903) Russian religious thinker and philosopher, futurist, librarian, teacher innovator. One of the founders of Russian... ... Wikipedia

Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov- Portrait of Nikolai Fedorov by Leonid Pasternak Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov (June 7, 1829 December 28, 1903) Russian religious thinker and philosopher, futurist, librarian, teacher innovator. One of the founders of Russian... ... Wikipedia

Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov- Portrait of Nikolai Fedorov by Leonid Pasternak Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov (June 7, 1829 December 28, 1903) Russian religious thinker and philosopher, futurist, librarian, teacher innovator. One of the founders of Russian... ... Wikipedia

Fedorov, Nikolai Fedorovich- Portrait of Nikolai Fedorov by Leonid Pasternak Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov (June 7, 1829 December 28, 1903) Russian religious thinker and philosopher, futurist, librarian, teacher innovator. One of the founders of Russian... ... Wikipedia

Books

• The cradle of humanity under the lies of world religions, Vadim Kryuk. This book invites the reader to look at the usual generally accepted historical process and established religious trends through the prism of new facts that shift the time frame deeper... Buy for 320 rubles eBook
• Mesopotamia. The Cradle of Humankind, Bardeski Chiara Dezzi. For thousands of years, on the land between the two rivers - the Tigris and the Euphrates - various nationalities coexisted or replaced each other. Historical meaning Mesopotamia as the “cradle of humanity” is difficult...

One of the reports on Hyperborea was given by ethnologist, art critic, candidate of historical sciences Svetlana Vasilievna Zharnikova, who has been studying this topic for more than 20 years, collecting information bit by bit, restoring the appearance of an amazing country, no less legendary than the famous Atlantis and Shambhala. However, no one still knows exactly where these countries are located, but Hyperborea is taking on very specific shapes - it is very close, and we are the descendants of its inhabitants.

We all went to school where we were told that our ancestors lived in the forest, worshiped pagan gods and remained savages until Christianity came and brought us to our senses. It is confusing that all true knowledge about that period of our history was destroyed along with the Magi, who were literally “cut out at the roots.” Who did it and why - the question remains open.

With the territory of the Russian North, things were even worse. It was believed that during the last glaciation all these lands were covered with a glacier, and therefore people could not live here. When the glacier finally melted - this happened about 8 thousand years ago - the Finno-Ugrians came here from beyond the Urals, who continued to live in their original style, that is, to hunt, fish and gather. Later, the Slavs reached these places, mixed with the Finno-Ugrians, and it turned out what we have now. This is the official version of our history. But not everyone thinks so.

Back in the mid-19th century, the rector of Boston University, Warren, wrote a book called “Paradise Found or the Life of Humanity at the North Pole.” The book went through 10 editions, the last of which appeared in Boston in 1889. The book has not been translated into Russian. This kind of work is only now being done. The translator says she is shocked - Warren, who worked with sources in 28 languages, analyzed myths from all over the world, right down to equatorial Africa and Central America and came to the conclusion that in all mythological systems paradise is located in the north. Moreover, Warren believes that the soul of the Earth or its information pole is also located above the North Pole.

At the beginning of the 20th century, scientists faced many questions regarding the Finno-Ugrians as our ancestors. Linguists could not understand why there are practically no Finno-Ugric words in the Northern Russian language. Anthropologists wondered why the faces of the Northern Russians were completely different from the faces of their “ancestors.” For example, the population of the Olonets province had the most elongated face of all European peoples, and the protrusion of the facial bones was 3 times greater than that of the Finno-Ugrians.

Northerners and Finno-Ugrians built houses in completely different ways. Their national ornaments were not similar. The names of villages, rivers, and lakes caused confusion. Academician Sobolevsky wrote back in the 20s: “... the overwhelming majority of the names of rivers and lakes in the Russian North come from some kind of Indo-European language, which, until a more suitable term is found, I call Scythian.” Science accused the academician of insanity. True, in the 60s, the work of the Swedish researcher Gunter Johanson appeared, who, after analyzing the toponymy of the entire north, came to the conclusion that all local names have an Indo-Iranian basis. At that time it could not have occurred to us that everything was the other way around - the Indo-Iranian languages ​​have a North Russian basis. And then thunder struck.
Paleoclimatologists came onto the scene, who were absolutely indifferent to what linguists, anthropologists, and cultural experts thought about this... According to drilling data, they found out that from 130 to 70 thousand years ago the northern territories between 55 and 70 degrees were located in optimal climatic regime. Average winter temperatures here were 12 degrees higher than now, and average summer temperatures were 8 degrees higher. This means that in those days there was the same climate as we have now in the south of France or the north of Spain! Climate zones Then they were located differently than now - the further south, the warmer, then it was warmer to the east, closer to the Urals.

It is here, according to linguists, that the northern people, which became the progenitor of many nations - those who reached the Sayan and Altai laid the foundation Turkic peoples; who stayed on the territory of Eastern Europe became the basis of the Indo-European peoples. An indirect confirmation of this are the myths of the Aryans or Indo-Iranians, which tell about their Arctic homeland. This is what the ancient legends say.

“In the north, where there is a pure, beautiful, gentle and desirable world, in that part of the Earth that is the most beautiful and purest of all, live the great gods Kubena (the Kubena River flows through the Vologda region - ed.) - seven sages, sons of the creator god Brahma , embodied in the seven stars of the Ursa Major And, finally, there is the ruler of the universe - Rudrahara, wearing light braids, with a light brown beard, the ancestor of all creatures.

In order to reach the world of the ancestral gods, one must overcome the great endless mountains that stretch from west to east. The sun makes its way around their golden peaks. Above them in the darkness shine the seven stars of the Big Dipper and the North Star, located motionless in the center of the universe. From these mountains all the great rivers of the earth flow down. Only one of them flows south to warm sea, and others to the north - to the white foam ocean. On the tops of these mountains the forests rustle, wonderful birds sing, wonderful animals live."

About the great ones northern mountains ah, ancient Greek authors also wrote. They believed that these mountains stretch from west to east, being the great border of Scythia. This is how they were depicted on one of the first maps of the Earth in VI BC. The father of history, Herodotus, wrote about the distant northern mountains stretching from west to east. Aristotle believed in the existence of the northern mountains, believing that all the most big rivers Europe, except Istria and Danube. Behind the mountains in northern Europe, ancient Greek and Roman geographers placed the Great Northern or Scythian Ocean.

These are the mysterious mountains for a long time and did not allow researchers to determine the exact position of Hyperborea - as the ancients called northern cradle civilization. They couldn't be Ural Mountains, since they stretch from north to south, and ancient sources clearly say that the mountains stretch from west to east and look like a bow curved to the south. Moreover, this arc ends in the extreme northwest and extreme northeast.

Finally, the search was crowned with success - according to legend, the western point was Mount Ganghamadana - in modern Karelian Zaonezhie there is also Mount Gandamadana; and the extreme eastern point is Mount Naroda, now this peak in the Polar Urals is called Narodnaya. Then it turns out that the mysterious ancient mountains are a chain of hills on the East European Plain, which is called the Northern Ridges!

Once upon a time it was an impregnable ridge, in a semi-ring covering the territory called Hyperborea. Now this place is located on the Kola Peninsula, Karelia, Arkhangelsk, Vologda region and the Komi Republic. The northern part of Hyperborea rests at the bottom Barents Sea. The reality completely coincided with the stories from ancient legends!

The fact that the Northern ridges were the border of Hyperborea is also confirmed modern research. So the Soviet scientist Meshcheryakov called them an anomaly of the East European Plain. In his works, he pointed out that even in those days when an ancient sea splashed on the site of the Urals, the Northern ridges were already mountains and were the main watershed of the rivers of the White and Caspian seas. Meshcheryakov argued that they are located exactly where the Hyperborean Mountains are located on Ptolemy’s map. According to this map, the Volga, which the ancients called Ra, originates in these mountains.

There is another indirect confirmation. Herodotus wrote about the hornlessness of bulls in the lands near the Hyperborean Mountains, which he associated with the harsh climate of these places. So, camel or hornless cattle, with high fat content in milk, still exist throughout almost the entire territory of the Russian North.

Having established the location of Hyperborea, scientists decided to find out what happened to the fate of the people who inhabited this country. The discoveries of archaeologists, ethnologists, and linguists have completely changed the idea of ​​history. We are accustomed to consider Ancient Greece a stronghold of human civilization, an oasis of its culture. Ancient Greek achievements spread throughout Europe, and we were also allowed to enjoy the fruits of its civilization. However, the data that has now appeared suggests that everything was exactly the opposite - the ancient Greek civilization was “grown” by the Hyperborean, much more ancient and highly developed. The ancient Greek sources themselves speak about this, according to which Apollo once a year “on a silver arrow” went to the distant northern country Hyperborea for knowledge.

In the Russian North, many ornaments have been preserved, which, according to experts, served as a prototype for creating ornaments not only Ancient Greece, but also Hindustan. Petroglyphs - drawings on rocks - found on the shores of the White and Onega Seas were the basis for the appearance of similar drawings in India. But what is most striking is the similarity of the languages ​​of peoples who are now separated by enormous distances.

Tatyana Yakovlevna Elizarenkova, a translator of Rigveda hymns, claims that Vedic Sanskrit and the Russian language are most consistent with each other. Let's compare languages ​​that seem so far from each other. “Uncle” - “dada”, “mother” - “matri”, “divo” - “divo”, “deva” - “devi”, “light” - “shveta”, “snow - snow”: here the first word is Russian , and the second is its analogue in Sanskrit.
The Russian meaning of the word "gat" is a road laid through a swamp. In Sanskrit "gati" means passage, path, road. The Sanskrit word “to tear” - to go, to run - corresponds to the Russian analogue - “to drag”; in Sanskrit "radalnya" - tears, crying, in Russian - "sobs".
Sometimes, without realizing it, we use tautology, using words with the same meaning twice. We say “tryn-grass”, and in Sanskrit “trin” means grass. We say “dense forest,” and “drema” means forest.

In the Vologda and Arkhangelsk dialects, many Sanskrit words have been preserved in pure form. So the North Russian “baht” means “maybe”: “I, baht, will come to you tomorrow.” In Sanskrit "bat" - truly, maybe. Severus "bus" - mold, soot, dirt. In Sanskrit, "busa" means waste, uncleanness. The Russian “kulnut” means to fall into the water, in Sanskrit “kula” means a canal, a stream. Examples can be given endlessly.

So the expression “we are all brothers” has a completely real basis. Now the territory of the former Hyperborea is a gigantic “white spot” - there are no people, roads and settlements. But it is there that the knowledge of the ancient civilization, which became the ancestor of many peoples of the Earth, is located. If we do not want to remain “Ivan the Rootless”, we need to go in search of our own history. Moreover, all this is very close.

The cave complex of Sterkfontein, Swartkrans, Kromdraai, Makapan, Taung, where fossil remains dating back 2.3 million years were discovered, and the surrounding area are known as the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site. This area covers an area of ​​over 47,000 hectares and is located northwest of Johannesburg. More than 17,000 fossils have been found here.

The area is of outstanding value as it contains a complex of paleo-anthropological sites that have provided valuable evidence of the origins of modern humans - hence its name "Cradle of Humankind". Currently, more than 200 caves have been discovered in the park (among which 13 have already been well studied), where fossils of human ancestors and wild animals that went extinct several million years ago have been found. A variety of stone tools used by ancient people, such as axes and scrapers, have been found here. Fossils of ancient extinct animals have been discovered, such as the short-necked giraffe, giant buffalo, giant hyena and several species saber tooth tigers. Numerous fossils of living animals such as leopard and tora antelope have also been found.

In 1935, Robert Broome found the first fossils in a cave in Sterkfontein. Evidence of the existence was obtained here Australopithecus africanus, who lived about 4-2 million years ago. Scientists believe that these hominids (upright walking apes) were the ancestors of humans. Hominids may have lived throughout Africa, but their remains have only been found in places where they were suitable conditions to preserve the remains.

The fossilized remains of another hominid species were also found in this area - the massive Paranthropus, which is considered an extinct branch family tree human development. Homo sapiens, who lived about 1,000,000 years ago, is more likely a direct ancestor of Homo sapiens than Australopithecus, with a very close resemblance to modern people.

The Cradle of Humankind is one of the most visited attractions in South Africa.